<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maybe I need a search extension &#8211; SearchaQuilla?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mesquilla.com/2009/11/20/maybe-i-need-a-search-extension-searchaquilla/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mesquilla.com/2009/11/20/maybe-i-need-a-search-extension-searchaquilla/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=maybe-i-need-a-search-extension-searchaquilla</link>
	<description>Messaging with Mozilla by rkent</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:10:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali Geyik</title>
		<link>http://mesquilla.com/2009/11/20/maybe-i-need-a-search-extension-searchaquilla/comment-page-1/#comment-1294</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali Geyik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mesquilla.com/?p=461#comment-1294</guid>
		<description>JS + RegEx search extension would bring the very much demanded &quot;variables&quot; support to Thunderbird, which would be GREAT IMHO..
Keep up stim &amp; good working
Best Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JS + RegEx search extension would bring the very much demanded &#8220;variables&#8221; support to Thunderbird, which would be GREAT IMHO..<br />
Keep up stim &amp; good working<br />
Best Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Noseworthy</title>
		<link>http://mesquilla.com/2009/11/20/maybe-i-need-a-search-extension-searchaquilla/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Noseworthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 18:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mesquilla.com/?p=461#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Hi there,
 A better search tool in Thunderbird 3+ would be fantastic.  3.0&#039;s Gloda-based search is cute and all,  but it is SLOW.  Not to search, but to ENTER your search.
 SO many TB 2.0 users crave the GmailUI addon&#039;s expression based search. With it, I can do a complicated search in &lt; 1sec, example:
 &quot;from: to:  body:&quot;
(though in gmailui its even shorter using f: t: and b:) 
 I can even say &quot;not&quot; (such as &quot;-f:&quot;) 

In TB 3.0+, from the quicksearch bar, its &quot;search all messages&quot; for one string (can&#039;t even specify if its from, to, etc).
Then the search tab eventually opens.
Then I have to scroll through all the &#039;people&#039; (852 in my TB) to select who to involve / not-involve.
Then I still can&#039;t search by subject or body contents,  so I better have started this search with the text I wanted to find in the subject or body.

OR
I can right-click on a folder and pop up the Search Messages dialog, 
and to make a &quot;f: -t: s: b:&quot; string, I have to go through 7 clicks and fill in the fields (once the pop-up is up) 

Hopefully the laborious examples convey how annoying search is in TB 3.0 right now,   an expression-based search from the quick-search bar (even if just for the current folder) would be phenomenal.

If the old gmailui&#039;s expression search can be updated to TB 3 then great,  if a slicker search utilizing gloda can be cranked out, fantastic,  but search from the &quot;quick&quot; search bar really needs to be QUICK and MUCH more powerful than it currently is(n&#039;t)

You asked &quot;Maybe I need a search extension&quot; - I&#039;m sure you&#039;ve got 100s of &quot;to-do&#039;s&quot;  but just search for gmailui and read all the users groans about lack of expression based search... 

  

Thanks for your time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,<br />
 A better search tool in Thunderbird 3+ would be fantastic.  3.0&#8242;s Gloda-based search is cute and all,  but it is SLOW.  Not to search, but to ENTER your search.<br />
 SO many TB 2.0 users crave the GmailUI addon&#8217;s expression based search. With it, I can do a complicated search in &lt; 1sec, example:<br />
 &quot;from: to:  body:&#8221;<br />
(though in gmailui its even shorter using f: t: and b:)<br />
 I can even say &#8220;not&#8221; (such as &#8220;-f:&#8221;) </p>
<p>In TB 3.0+, from the quicksearch bar, its &#8220;search all messages&#8221; for one string (can&#8217;t even specify if its from, to, etc).<br />
Then the search tab eventually opens.<br />
Then I have to scroll through all the &#8216;people&#8217; (852 in my TB) to select who to involve / not-involve.<br />
Then I still can&#8217;t search by subject or body contents,  so I better have started this search with the text I wanted to find in the subject or body.</p>
<p>OR<br />
I can right-click on a folder and pop up the Search Messages dialog,<br />
and to make a &#8220;f: -t: s: b:&#8221; string, I have to go through 7 clicks and fill in the fields (once the pop-up is up) </p>
<p>Hopefully the laborious examples convey how annoying search is in TB 3.0 right now,   an expression-based search from the quick-search bar (even if just for the current folder) would be phenomenal.</p>
<p>If the old gmailui&#8217;s expression search can be updated to TB 3 then great,  if a slicker search utilizing gloda can be cranked out, fantastic,  but search from the &#8220;quick&#8221; search bar really needs to be QUICK and MUCH more powerful than it currently is(n&#8217;t)</p>
<p>You asked &#8220;Maybe I need a search extension&#8221; &#8211; I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve got 100s of &#8220;to-do&#8217;s&#8221;  but just search for gmailui and read all the users groans about lack of expression based search&#8230; </p>
<p>Thanks for your time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

