<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>MesQuilla - Forum: FiltaQuilla</title>
	<link>http://mesquilla.com/forum/filtaquilla/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[Messaging with Mozilla by rkent]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Version 4.3.1</generator>
	<atom:link href="http://mesquilla.com/forum/?filtaquilla&#038;xfeed=forum" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
	<title>stebi on How to filter via JavaScript the message body</title>
	<link>http://mesquilla.com/forum/filtaquilla/how-to-filter-via-javascript-the-message-body/#p315</link>
	<category>FiltaQuilla</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://mesquilla.com/forum/filtaquilla/how-to-filter-via-javascript-the-message-body/#p315</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your answer, although it is disappointing.</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 01:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>rkent on How to filter via JavaScript the message body</title>
	<link>http://mesquilla.com/forum/filtaquilla/how-to-filter-via-javascript-the-message-body/#p314</link>
	<category>FiltaQuilla</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://mesquilla.com/forum/filtaquilla/how-to-filter-via-javascript-the-message-body/#p314</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Although I added some hooks to the core code that I had hoped would allow me to get message bodies in a custom filter, the hooks were not sufficient. All of my attempts to get the body in custom search terms have been unsuccessful. So as far as I kknow, you cannot do this at present. I appreciate that this is an important issue that needs to be resolved.</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>rkent on Bug on Save Attachments To</title>
	<link>http://mesquilla.com/forum/filtaquilla/bug-on-save-attachments-to/#p313</link>
	<category>FiltaQuilla</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://mesquilla.com/forum/filtaquilla/bug-on-save-attachments-to/#p313</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>I can confirm that this occurs as you described. I looked at the code for this as well. Unfortunately the code to save the value of that string is all in core, and would probably need to be fixed in core. I'l make a note of that as a possible future fix (since I also am the main person who maintains the core code).</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>OlegBou on Bug on Save Attachments To</title>
	<link>http://mesquilla.com/forum/filtaquilla/bug-on-save-attachments-to/#p312</link>
	<category>FiltaQuilla</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://mesquilla.com/forum/filtaquilla/bug-on-save-attachments-to/#p312</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve saved network address to save attachments as</p>
<p>\\SQ\Tech.Info\intel.com\PCNalert.com</p>
<p>but after reloading Thunderbird this address is changed to</p>
<p>\SQ\Tech.Info\intel.com\PCNalert.com</p>
<p>so for all addresses with two first slashes.</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>stebi on How to filter via JavaScript the message body</title>
	<link>http://mesquilla.com/forum/filtaquilla/how-to-filter-via-javascript-the-message-body/#p311</link>
	<category>FiltaQuilla</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://mesquilla.com/forum/filtaquilla/how-to-filter-via-javascript-the-message-body/#p311</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>How do I get the message body via javascript? </p>
<p>It seems that with "message.getStringProperty" one can only access header properties.</p>
<p>My goal is to find a multi line text in the message.</p>
<p>Thanks in advance for your help.</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>klint on Automatic run of filters based on schedule/frequency</title>
	<link>http://mesquilla.com/forum/filtaquilla/automatic-run-of-filters-based-on-schedulefrequency/#p310</link>
	<category>FiltaQuilla</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://mesquilla.com/forum/filtaquilla/automatic-run-of-filters-based-on-schedulefrequency/#p310</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, that would be very nice and handy indeed <img src="/wp-content/forum-smileys/sf-laugh.gif" alt="Laugh" /></p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>rkent on Automatic run of filters based on schedule/frequency</title>
	<link>http://mesquilla.com/forum/filtaquilla/automatic-run-of-filters-based-on-schedulefrequency/#p309</link>
	<category>FiltaQuilla</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://mesquilla.com/forum/filtaquilla/automatic-run-of-filters-based-on-schedulefrequency/#p309</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>This is a much-requested feature, but as far as I know it has not been implemented anywhere. It&#039;s not terribly difficult to do, so I will consider it for future versions of FiltaQuilla.</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 07:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>klint on Automatic run of filters based on schedule/frequency</title>
	<link>http://mesquilla.com/forum/filtaquilla/automatic-run-of-filters-based-on-schedulefrequency/#p308</link>
	<category>FiltaQuilla</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://mesquilla.com/forum/filtaquilla/automatic-run-of-filters-based-on-schedulefrequency/#p308</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello</p>
<p>Is there a way to schedule automatic runs of a filter, based on a frequency or whatever...<br />
The goal could be to sweep all mails every week in search of mails older than 15 days and not yet answer and execute an action on each of them, like sending automatic replies.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Thanks <img src="/wp-content/forum-smileys/sf-laugh.gif" alt="Laugh" /></p>
<p>Olivier</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 06:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>rkent on For retroactive use; for deletion; Eudora OSE; safety</title>
	<link>http://mesquilla.com/forum/filtaquilla/for-retroactive-use-for-deletion-eudora-ose-safety/#p307</link>
	<category>FiltaQuilla</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://mesquilla.com/forum/filtaquilla/for-retroactive-use-for-deletion-eudora-ose-safety/#p307</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>I would be interested in seeing an email that fails with "save". You could send me a test email to <a href="mailto:rkent@mesquilla.com" target="_blank">rkent@mesquilla.com</a></p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Henry Lester on For retroactive use; for deletion; Eudora OSE; safety</title>
	<link>http://mesquilla.com/forum/filtaquilla/for-retroactive-use-for-deletion-eudora-ose-safety/#p306</link>
	<category>FiltaQuilla</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://mesquilla.com/forum/filtaquilla/for-retroactive-use-for-deletion-eudora-ose-safety/#p306</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for (1); it does indeed solve my issue (A)</p>
<p>Another problem: </p>
<p>3) The Apple Mail attachment bug.</p>
<p>Thunderbird bug reports mention that the "detach" feature does not work on some messages sent from Apple Mail.  Apparently Filtaquilla&#039;s "save attachment" feature fails in this regard too–it saves zero-length attachment files.  </p>
<p> We&#039;re not dicussing "detach" here, merely "save attachment"–surprising in view of rkent&#039;s comment (2) that "save" operates differently from "detach".   If you like, I&#039;ll have my Mac correspondent send you a test email.</p>
<p>.</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 05:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>rkent on For retroactive use; for deletion; Eudora OSE; safety</title>
	<link>http://mesquilla.com/forum/filtaquilla/for-retroactive-use-for-deletion-eudora-ose-safety/#p305</link>
	<category>FiltaQuilla</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://mesquilla.com/forum/filtaquilla/for-retroactive-use-for-deletion-eudora-ose-safety/#p305</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Response to questions:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>1) In TB 3 and later, there is a filter option to run the filter "after classification". When you use this option, then the filters run after the junk mail classifier (and new search options are available, including junk status and junk percent).</p>
<p>2) Save attachments does not AFAIK rewrite the message. However, detach attachment (which requires TB 3.1) does rewrite the message.</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 13:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Henry Lester on For retroactive use; for deletion; Eudora OSE; safety</title>
	<link>http://mesquilla.com/forum/filtaquilla/for-retroactive-use-for-deletion-eudora-ose-safety/#p304</link>
	<category>FiltaQuilla</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://mesquilla.com/forum/filtaquilla/for-retroactive-use-for-deletion-eudora-ose-safety/#p304</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Two feature requests, two questions, and a comment. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Feature requests: These might be tough.</p>
<p>1.   Option to delete the attachment when the message is transferred to trash or when deleted from trash.</p>
<p>2.  Lower priority (I don&#039;t need this, but others might).  For retroactive use–saving all previous attchments from many years of Thunderbird email–one could request the following option: the saved file has the date of the original email.  Attachment Extractor can do this but is no longer maintained and has glitches.  You are currently more involved with Thunderbird. </p>
<p>Questions</p>
<p>A.   How to ensure that Filtaquilla runs **after** junk filtering, to avoid clogging up the saved attachments folder w/ junk.</p>
<p>B.  If I simply command Filtaquilla to save attachments, does it still rewrite the message–with the attendant possibilities for corruption?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Comment:</p>
<p>i.  Seems to work with Eudora OSE 1.0rc2, which derives from thunderbird 3.0.4</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 13:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>rkent on Saved Attachments 0(zero)</title>
	<link>http://mesquilla.com/forum/filtaquilla/saved-attachments-0zero/#p303</link>
	<category>FiltaQuilla</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://mesquilla.com/forum/filtaquilla/saved-attachments-0zero/#p303</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>You can email me at <a href="mailto:rkent@mesquilla.com" target="_blank">rkent@mesquilla.com</a></p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 06:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Marcos on Saved Attachments 0(zero)</title>
	<link>http://mesquilla.com/forum/filtaquilla/saved-attachments-0zero/#p302</link>
	<category>FiltaQuilla</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://mesquilla.com/forum/filtaquilla/saved-attachments-0zero/#p302</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello friend. Sorry to insist with filtaquilla, tried to make his suggestion, but unfortunately</p>
<p> could not. I ask you have email? remote support? Really needed their help. English </p>
<p>and I&#039;m sorry because I am from Brazil and use the Portuguese language, making </p>
<p>translations by google.</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 03:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>rkent on Saved Attachments 0(zero)</title>
	<link>http://mesquilla.com/forum/filtaquilla/saved-attachments-0zero/#p301</link>
	<category>FiltaQuilla</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://mesquilla.com/forum/filtaquilla/saved-attachments-0zero/#p301</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t fully understand your post I&#039;m afraid. But let me describe the problem more fully, and why it is difficult to solve, and offer a workaround.</p>
<p>The detach operation actually must rewrite the message in its message store. That is an async operation - as is a move. There is no way in the base filter code currently to coordinate the operation of two async actions on a single message in a single folder.</p>
<p>However, I was able to devise a method to get around this using the existing FiltaQuilla. It is a little tricky, but feel free to try it. It will only work with messages moved to an IMAP store.</p>
<p>1) With FiltaQuilla installed, enable processing of message filters in the destination folder using (select folder)/(right click)/Properties/(enable "Apply incoming Filters")</p>
<p>2) On the IMAP account, create a first filter which is a move. In addition to whatever your usual move criteria is, add an additional search criteria which uses a javascript search term, and rejects the filter if the folder matches the destination. So if for example the folder name is "xxx1" add a javascript search term (matches):</p>
<p>  message.folder.name != &#039;xxx1&#039;</p>
<p>3) Add an additional filter, located after the MOVE filter, that does the message detach</p>
<p>On my tests, this combination was able to successfully do a detach after a move. Obviously I need to develop an easier way to do this and get core and/or FiltaQuilla patches to do this.</p>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 10:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>