Forum

I occasionally see emails that obviously did not go through junk mail processing as well. Without JunQuilla you never notice that, as they just appear as normal good emails.

But I would hate to try to fix a bug in the core by adding some feature to JunQuilla. I would rather do that by fixing the root cause in core, though I have no idea what is causing this nor how to reproduce it. I suspect that somehow the system gets too busy, and as a result the junk filter is unable to get the copy of the message that it needs to analyze for junk.

As to FiltaQuilla, it would be quite easy to add a filter action to analyze a message for junk. I've added it to my list of requests. Then you could at least try adding a filter, which would need to be post-classification, that tries to detect a message that did not get analyzed, and request again that it be analyzed.

I wish I knew how to reproduce your issue with the forum display. Maybe I'll look in the forum support newsgroups and see if anyone else has had this issue.

What a possible future custom filter action in FiltaQuilla could do easily is to kick off standard junk mail processing, nothing more.

But you can run filters after junk mail processing, and not before. That is done by selecting "after classification" when you setup the filter. The main thing that this does is to make the junk-related search terms available (junkpercent, junkstatus, and junkscoreorigin). Using those terms, you could take arbitrary action on the email. None of that depends on JunQuilla by the way, though I did do the core implementation of the "after classification" feature.

This is much more difficult than it should be (and I should really fix that in core). I was able to do this with a series of (junkstatusorigin ISNT …) filters, filling in all of the valid junstatusorigin values (whitelist, plugin, user). If the bayes filter sets it, the origin is plugin.